![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.chilltravelers.com\/chill\/wp-content\/uploads\/pence.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
I have been involved with nanotechnology as a part of my work at Los Alamos National Labs for many years. \u00a0As a former Fortune 500 high tech CEO, engineer and scientist in Silicone Valley, I have never mixed well with politicians and government types. \u00a0In 2000, I did a “Futurists View” Pentagon briefing for brass and ![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.chilltravelers.com\/chill\/wp-content\/uploads\/nasa.jpg\")
tech types on nanobots, mesh networks and AI (artificial intelligence). \u00a0The idea and presentation then was to use swarms of tiny flying robots that all communicated together to find intelligence information and report back. \u00a0Part of the discussion even included hunter bots using DNA based recognition. \u00a0Did I mention I do not get along with politicians and government types. \u00a0Especially ones that have no clue what you are talking about.<\/p>\n
Fast forward 2018 and I am still trying to explain even smaller bots and how they can be used for communication and managing AI in remote locations.<\/p>\n
So what does this have to do with the NASA logo?<\/p>\n
Well, safe to say that I have been a fan of NASA scientists for as long as I can remember. \u00a0I truly believe that NASA has some of the greatest geniuses going. \u00a0All of JPL should be elevated to star status in my book. \u00a0Holy crap, I am starting to sound like a politician, so down to it. \u00a0right!<\/p>\n
NASA should not be building rockets and NASA should be privatized to get it out of the hands of government anal-pores. \u00a0NASA science is brilliant and all of the budget should focus on developing science while leaving the exploration to private sectors. \u00a0Okay okay, you might say that SpaceX has not been around a long time, but the truth is that outside low-bid companies like Boeing, Northrup et al have been like pigs waiting at the feeding trough and ever took their own initiative to “go where no man has gone before<\/em>.” \u00a0The system of chucking stuff into orbit is broken and continued funding of the $3 Billion per launch SLS is insane.<\/p>\n Then it was off to the design computer to bring the new logo home. \u00a0Keeping the old for history and adding the new so that NASA could be a skip-generation provider again. \u00a0Oh, and that four letter word for innovation was all too obvious.<\/p>\n There is a thing called first principle which is used in science, mathematics, engineering and just about everything else. \u00a0The concept has been around a long time. \u00a0Defined,\u00a0A first principle<\/b> is a basic, foundational, self-evident proposition or assumption that cannot be deduced from any other proposition or assumption. In philosophy, first principles are taught by Aristotelians, and nuanced versions of first principles are referred to as postulates by Kantians.<\/sup> In mathematics, first principles are referred to as axioms or postulates. In physics and other sciences, theoretical work is said to be from first principles, or ab initio<\/i>, if it starts directly at the level of established science and does not make assumptions such as empirical model and parameter fitting. \u00a0In short, if the basic principle or foundation is sound and simple, the structure above it can and should succeed. \u00a0Contra, if the foundation is based on Jello, not much above it is on firm ground.<\/p>\n It is said that the great magician Merlin gained the graces of King Arthur merely by moving the foundation of his castle from sand to bedrock. \u00a0Simply, it is finding the signal within all the noise. \u00a0Today, the signal to noise ratio is changing and in my humble opinion, there is a pony in this pile.<\/p>\n NASA was built on the shoulders of Werner Von Braun and team. \u00a0They were risk takers and put men on the moon in less than ten years. \u00a0Since then, NASA has succeeded not on rocketry, but on the science of exploration. \u00a0Today, building rockets should be left to the new age rocketeers.<\/p>\n We need a new NASA logo and a new NASA and its name should be changed to MUSK…that four letter word that means innovation.<\/p>\n Mr. Trump, it is time to privatize NASA<\/p>\n Yep, sounds like an opinion, but it is actually just about time!<\/p>\n NASA, grab your cheeks! \u00a0It is about to get very interesting…and please try, try, try to not get in the way!<\/p>\n Bob<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"What’s the Point Bob?<\/h3>\n
![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.chilltravelers.com\/chill\/wp-content\/uploads\/musk-meatball.png\")
Okay, here is the funny part. \u00a0I am observing a Space Council meeting and a speaker talks about how great NASA is and that someone should design a 60 anniversary logo. \u00a0The Vice President droned and droned thanking and glad handing everyone and anyone. \u00a0Pointing his finger here and there, I lost consciousness. \u00a0My evil twin emerged and I began to doodle on my iPad as if I was taking notes. \u00a0Hiding my doodles, I started with the blue meatball and added the red swoosh. \u00a0I added some stars and colored one red. \u00a0Then I added Mars – -because that is where everyone is talking about going. \u00a0I always wondered why nothing was in that white orbit around the red swoosh. \u00a0NASA has become synonymous with watching paint dry, so I struggle for a four letter word that means innovative thinking because NASA just doesn’t cut it anymore.<\/p>\nTime Waits for No One<\/h3>\n